Iran’s Supreme National Security Council says there will be no inspections if biting UN sanctions are reinstated by the West.
Tehran, Iran – Iran is trying to pass a resolution prohibiting attacks on nuclear installations at the United Nations global nuclear watchdog as its Supreme National Security Council backed nuclear inspections after strikes by the United States and Israel during a 12-day conflict in June.
Iran’s top nuclear officials are now in Vienna to participate in the 69th General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which starts later on Monday and ends on Friday.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items
- list 1 of 3Attacking Qatar shows Israel doesn’t want a Gaza ceasefire
- list 2 of 3How long had Israel been planning its attack in Qatar?
- list 3 of 3Israel threatens to unleash biblical plagues on Yemen’s Houthis
end of list
They have said they will table a resolution that bans attacks on any nuclear facilities, but have not publicly revealed the language or full text of the document.
After arriving in the Austrian capital, Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), told Iranian state media that the conference is a good opportunity to direct attention to IAEA moves, particularly its director, Rafael Grossi, that have raised questions about the agency’s credibility.
“We witnessed the agency’s lack of professional conduct, as this body, without taking any position, did not condemn [attacks on Iran] and instead acted in a very neutral manner – it applied a double standard to perfection,” Eslami said, pointing out that Grossi has repeatedly and explicitly condemned attacks on Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.
“Even if this resolution is not adopted, it shows that the Charter of the United Nations has, in the truest sense of the word, been damaged.”
Iranian officials plan to hold negotiations with some of the 180 member states of the conference, but they have admitted it is possible the resolution will not even be put to a vote.
According to Iran’s deputy nuclear chief Behrouz Kamalvandi, who is also in Vienna, the US is putting pressure on member states to block the resolution and has “even threatened the agency that they will cut off assistance to the organisation”.
But Kamalvandi said there is precedent for resolutions, issued by the UN Security Council (UNSC) and the IAEA, similar to what Tehran is proposing.
He named UNSC Resolution 487, which was adopted in 1981 to explicitly condemn Israel’s air strikes on Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor as a violation of the UN Charter, called on Israel to refrain from such acts, and recognised the right of all states to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes under IAEA safeguards.
Kamalvandi also pointed to two IAEA General Conference resolutions, one passed in 1985 and another adopted in 1990, which emphasised the principle of protecting safeguarded nuclear facilities and urged member states to support universal respect for the prohibition of attacks.
Since the US reneged on Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers under President Donald Trump in 2018 and unilaterally imposed sanctions, the Board of Governors of the IAEA has adopted four Western-backed censure resolutions against Iran, which maintains its nuclear programme is for peaceful civilian purposes.
Neither US intelligence nor the IAEA found that Iran was pursuing an atomic weapon earlier this year.
Israel started attacking Iran on June 13, a day after the agency found Iran noncompliant with its commitments to international nuclear safeguards, prompting Tehran to accuse the watchdog of paving the way for the 12-day war that killed more than 1,000 people and inflicted damage estimated at billions of dollars across Iran.
Iran warns against sanctions
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reached an agreement with the IAEA in the Egyptian capital, Cairo, last week to restart nuclear inspections that have been halted after the bombings by the US and Israel.
He emphasised that the deal, which the agency said will comprise all facilities, including those bombed, was greenlit by the country’s Supreme National Security Council.
The council, which includes representatives appointed by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the president, parliament and judiciary chiefs, several ministers, and military commanders, will have to give case-by-case permission for inspections.
But hardliners within the establishment, especially those dominating the parliament, have been voicing opposition to any more inspections, claiming they could lead to more attacks by the US and Israel.
This prompted the council to issue a statement on Sunday, emphasising that its nuclear commission has endorsed the deal with the IAEA.
The council stressed that IAEA inspectors currently have no access beyond the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, and that Iran’s nuclear authorities are assessing whether the bombed sites – which are buried deep underground – are safe to visit in terms of contamination and possibility of access.
“Should any hostile action be taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran and its nuclear facilities – including the reactivation of previously terminated Security Council resolutions – the implementation of these arrangements will be suspended,” Iran’s Supreme National Security Council stated.
That was in reference to a US-backed effort by France, Germany and the United Kingdom, the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal, to activate the “snapback” mechanism of the landmark accord, which could potentially reinstate all UN sanctions previously lifted.
