As Utah judge hears arguments on limiting press coverage, national media groups and the victim’s widow advocate for public access in the politically charged case.
SALT LAKE CITY — A Utah judge heard arguments Thursday over whether to restrict media coverage in the capital murder trial of Tyler Robinson, who is accused of killing conservative commentator Charlie Kirk—a case that has ignited debate over transparency, fair trial rights, and political influence.
Robinson, 22, faces aggravated murder charges in the September shooting at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty. His defense attorneys, alongside the Utah County Sheriff’s Office, requested Judge Tony Graf to bar cameras from the courtroom, citing concerns that saturation media coverage could prejudice potential jurors.
A coalition of news organizations, including The Associated Press, is challenging the proposed limits, arguing that public access ensures accountability in a high-stakes prosecution. Michael Judd, representing the media group, stressed that open courts “safeguard the integrity of the fact-finding process.”
Judge Graf has already imposed some restrictions following a closed hearing in October, allowing Robinson to appear in civilian clothes but under physical restraint, and banning images of those restraints. Robinson’s lawyers highlighted the spread of digitally altered photos of their client online and pointed to statements from former President Donald Trump—who said soon after the arrest, “I hope he gets the death penalty”—as evidence of a prejudicial atmosphere.
Erika Kirk, the victim’s widow, has publicly urged for cameras to remain in court. “We deserve to have cameras in there,” she said, calling for full transparency.
The outcome of Thursday’s hearing could shape how one of Utah’s most watched criminal proceedings balances public scrutiny with Sixth Amendment protections, as both legal teams prepare for a trial that has drawn attention from across the political spectrum.
